- Awesome agent liked my synopsis advice!
- True sportsmanship
- What the 2016 World Series taught us
- Dave Barry columns
- Reader's Digest Funny Stories
- Journey to the Centre of the Earth
- Info for writers making a will
- "Merry Christmas, My Friend"
- Night Before Christmas - Legal Edition
- Top 10 military stories of 2016
- THIS WEEK'S FEATURED LINK: Do you need libel insurance for your tweets?
Monday, February 1, 2016
Being female in the legal profession
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — A dress code imposed by a Kansas Senate committee chairman that prohibits women testifying on bills from wearing low-cut necklines and miniskirts is drawing bipartisan ridicule from female legislators.
Sen. Mitch Holmes' 11-point code of conduct does not include any restrictions on men, who he said needed no instruction on how to look professional, The Topeka Capital-Journal reported.
"Oh, for crying out loud, what century is this?" Sen. Laura Kelly, a Topeka Democrat, said Thursday.
I'm glad to see “bipartisan ridicule.”
Then there is a judge in California –
One California judge who seems to have a bad habit of disrespecting women in his courthouse recently received a gentle slap on the wrist — a public admonishment — for his behavior from the state Commission on Judicial Performance.
Judge Joseph Bergeron, an 18-year veteran of the San Mateo County Superior Court, has a history of “treat[ing] certain women at court inappropriately,” dating back to at least October 2013, when he was told by the court’s presiding judge to stop treating female court employees in a “rude, abrasive and condescending” manner after six of them came forward with complaints. Less than one year later, Judge Bergeron was back to his old tricks.
The article goes on to describe similar behavior to a female attorney appearing in his courtroom. I suppose you can say at least he's consistent in his treatment of ALL women in the courthouse.
Thankfully, it's been a loooooong time since I've had to deal with this sort of behavior.