tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6051039811201306685.post5228246167029614461..comments2024-03-23T10:57:20.584-07:00Comments on Dena's Ramblings: Title VII DiscriminationDena Pawlinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14444683810125395220noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6051039811201306685.post-24307081893944490152021-05-22T19:59:19.869-07:002021-05-22T19:59:19.869-07:00True. And she was a partner and not an employee. ...True. And she was a partner and not an employee. That's what really stood out to me.<br />Dena Pawlinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14444683810125395220noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6051039811201306685.post-21676194773803530912021-05-22T19:58:32.049-07:002021-05-22T19:58:32.049-07:00Good point!Good point!Dena Pawlinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14444683810125395220noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6051039811201306685.post-8002099992692105522021-05-17T20:31:12.204-07:002021-05-17T20:31:12.204-07:00I agree medical details shouldn't have been ne...I agree medical details shouldn't have been needed, but a medical certificate surely would have been? We need one in Oz - it usually says "medical reasons" with the dates the leave covers and is issued by your GP or specialist.<br /><br />Although from what has been said, it doesn't mean her race or gender had anything to do with the denial of leave. I can think of a myriad of reasons why it might have been refused.AJ Blythehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04529233142099749005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6051039811201306685.post-13517816852924564762021-05-17T09:57:53.275-07:002021-05-17T09:57:53.275-07:00No, I do not agree. Medical privacy was codified i...No, I do not agree. Medical privacy was codified in 1996, with HIPAA.<br /><br />There should be no need to disclose the why, if such leave terms have already been used.Craig Fhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07157301156577795781noreply@blogger.com